Arguments 

Phone companies should be forced to compensate people living next to their masts

 
12 Oct 04:   FOR
It should be possible for home owners to sue the operators for the massive damage to their property values.
6 Oct 04:   OTHER INFO
Links:-
Mast Action Group - freespace.virgin.net/mast.action/
Mast Sanity - www.mastaction.org/network.htm
Planning Sanity - www.planningsanity.co.uk/
Stewart report - www.iegmp.org.uk/programme/index.htm
Mast location maps - www.sitefinder.radio.gov.uk
Phone network info - www.sitefinder.radio.gov.uk/mobilework.htm

6 Oct 04:   FOR
The government says there is no conclusive evidence of health risk - however the government is making a lot of money out of mobile phones so the evidence will never be conclusive.
Regardless of whether the mast is a health hazard or not the important point is that there is a 'perceived risk' which has a real and dramatic effect on property values so this should be a valid basis for a planning objection.

Its obvious that this has a major impact on the value of their property - probably 25,000 or more
 
Password:      
  • If you want to input your own topics or arguments see Help